Evaluation of ‘For survivors by survivors’, a cancer survivorship peer support pilot program for healthcare staff: A one-group post-test-only study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

<jats:sec id="sec001"> <jats:title>Introduction</jats:title> <jats:p>The number of people living with and beyond cancer has risen significantly due to medical advancements. The cancer journey remains physically, socially, and psychologically challenging. Peer support is important in cancer survivorship as it provides emotional validation and understanding, practical advice and a sense of belonging. A peer support program was developed to assist healthcare staff in Ireland who have had a diagnosis of cancer in their recovery and engagement with their workplace and work.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="sec002"> <jats:title>Aim</jats:title> <jats:p>To examine and evaluate the effectiveness and impact of the “for survivors by survivors” pilot cancer survivorship program for the peer supporter, the person being supported (peer) and the line manager of the peer supporter.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="sec003"> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Three researcher-designed surveys were distributed via a voluntary cancer awareness and support services organization that acted as the gatekeeper. Data were collected on demographic and program-related factors and experience. Data were then analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with open-ended questions analyzed using inductive content analysis.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="sec004"> <jats:title>Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>For all three groups (peers, peer supporters and line managers; n = 42) 98% would recommend the program in the future. For peers 74% (n = 11) reported increased emotional well-being after interactions with their peer supporter; and large statistically significant improvements for communication, knowledge, information-seeking and self-confidence (effect sizes r = 0.67–0.80; p-values<0.05). For peer supporters, 84% (n = 16) evaluated the training and program positively, and 42% (n = 8) preferred in-person training. For line managers 88% (n = 7) were satisfied with the program. The most common barrier to participation for all three groups was time constraints. Awareness of the program was reported as low.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="sec005"> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Peer support programs for cancer survivors can enhance emotional well-being at work. The effectiveness of such programs is constrained by practical barriers such as time limitations and low program awareness. Addressing these issues is essential for improving program reach and impact.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
Original languageEnglish
JournalPLOS ONE
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of ‘For survivors by survivors’, a cancer survivorship peer support pilot program for healthcare staff: A one-group post-test-only study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this