Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to reduce mental health related stigma in the workplace: a systematic review

  • Mónika Ditta Tóth
  • , Sarah Ihionvien
  • , Caleb Leduc
  • , Birgit Aust
  • , Benedikt L. Amann
  • , Johanna Cresswell-Smith
  • , Hanna Reich
  • , Grace Cully
  • , Sarita Sanches
  • , Naim Fanaj
  • , Gentiana Qirjako
  • , Fotini Tsantila
  • , Victoria Ross
  • , Sharna Mathieu
  • , Arlinda Cerga Pashoja
  • , Ella Arensman
  • , György Purebl
  • Semmelweis University
  • National Research Centre for the Working Environment
  • Hospital del Mar
  • Pompeu Fabra University
  • National Institute for Health and Welfare
  • German Depression Foundation
  • Goethe University Frankfurt
  • University College Cork
  • National Suicide Research Foundation Ireland
  • Phrenos Center of Expertise for Severe Mental Illness
  • Altrecht Mental Health Care
  • Mental Health Center Prizren
  • University of Medicine
  • KU Leuven
  • Griffith University Queensland
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives Increasing access to mental health support is a key factor for treating mental disorders, however, important barriers complicate help-seeking, among them, mental health related stigma being most prominent. We aimed to systematically review the current evidence for interventions focusing on reducing stigma related to mental health problems in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Design Systematic review with a focus on interventions targeting mental health related stigma in the workplace in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The methodological quality of included articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies Scale. Data sources PubMed, Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Cochrane databases and Google Scholar were searched from January 2010 until November 2022. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies We included experimental or quasi-experimental studies about workplace interventions aiming to reduce stigma, where the outcomes were measured in terms of stigmatisation against depression, anxiety and/or other mental health problems. Data extraction and synthesis Records were screened by two independent reviewers after inspecting titles and abstracts and a full-text read of the articles to assess whether they meet inclusion criteria. The results were synthesised narratively. Results We identified 22 intervention studies, 3 with high quality, 13 with moderate quality and 6 with weak quality. Only 2 studies included SMEs, but no study focused on SMEs exclusively. The mode of delivery of the intervention was face to face in 15 studies, online in 4 studies and mixed in 3 studies. We found a significant reduction in stigmatising attitudes in almost all studies (20/22), using 10 different instruments/scales. Effects seemed to be independent of company size. Online interventions were found to be shorter, but seemed to be as effective as face-to-face interventions. Conclusions Although we did not find interventions focusing exclusively on SMEs, it is likely that antistigma interventions also will work in smaller workplaces.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere067126
JournalBMJ Open
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Feb 2023

Keywords

  • Depression & mood disorders
  • MENTAL HEALTH
  • OCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to reduce mental health related stigma in the workplace: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this