Abstract
Lea & Webley's (L&W's) non-exclusive distinction between tool-like and drug-like motivators is insufficiently discriminating to say much about money that is useful, as the distinction's equivocal application to sex, food, and drugs shows. Further, it appears as though the motivations of problem gamblers are non-metaphorically like those of drug addicts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 192-193 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
