Abstract
Linear constraints occur naturally in many reasoning problems and the information that they represent is often uncertain. There is a difficulty in applying AI uncertainty formalisms to this situation, as their representation of the underlying logic, either as a mutually exclusive and exhaustive set of possibilities, or with a propositional or a predicate logic, is inappropriate (or at least unhelpful). To overcome this difficulty, we express reasoning with linear constraints as a logic, and develop the formalisms based on this different underlying logic. We focus in particular on a possibilistic logic representation of uncertain linear constraints, a lattice-valued possibilistic logic, an assumption-based reasoning formalism and a Dempster-Shafer representation, proving some fundamental results for these extended systems. Our results on extending uncertainty formalisms also apply to a very general class of underlying monotonic logics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 83-98 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | International Journal of Approximate Reasoning |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sep 2008 |
Keywords
- Assumption-based reasoning
- Dempster-Shafer theory
- Lattice-valued possibilistic logic
- Linear constraints
- Possibilistic logic
- Spatial and temporal reasoning