Abstract
This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy's protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American sociologist, Erving Goffman, the paper challenges the idea that the authentic self can be recognised in law. Second, the paper argues that false privacy sits uneasily with tort law's doctrinal framework. While the paper focuses on English tort law, it pursues its lines of argument in a comparative context, exploring how German and US law give expression to false privacy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 282-305 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journal of European Tort Law |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'False Privacy and Information Games'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver