Abstract
This article examines the extent to which the law should permit divergence in various aspects of state education by allowing schools to accede to a parent's request for different treatment for his or her child. With a view to this the article explores some of the areas where contention is likely to occur; describes the current legal frameworks for responding to these requests; and articulates the competing rights and interests at stake when a parent makes a request for his or her child to be exempt from part of the education on offer at a publicly funded school. It emerges that the current legal responses are not only inconsistent but are also in many instances incompatible with the United Kingdom's international human rights obligations. The article concludes by suggesting a new model for the resolution of these disputes which provides a mechanism for balancing parents' wishes with children's rights and the broader public interests at stake.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 346-372 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Family values in the classroom? reconciling parental wishes and children's rights in state schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver