Folk Religion in Discourse and Practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

‘Folk religion’ is a contested category within the study of religions, with scholars increasingly advocating its abandonment. This paper encourages a new critical engagement with ‘folk religion’ as both a category of analysis and as a field of prac-tice. I argue for a renewed attentiveness to the ideological dimensions of categories deployed by scholars and to the relationship they bear to the field of practice they seek to signify. Firstly, I explore the discursive nature of the construction of ‘folk religion’ as a category of analysis and how its semantic loading functions to ‘pick up’ distinctive practices from the religious field. Secondly, drawing on the work of Bourdieu and Riesebrodt, I characterise the ‘folk religious field of practice’ as relational, a shifting site of competing agencies. My argument is illustrated with empirical examples drawn from ethnographic research in Romania and Moldova
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
Pages (from-to)3-18
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Ethnology and Folkloristics
Volume7
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Keywords

  • folk religion
  • vernacular religion
  • Romania
  • Bourdieu
  • Riesebrodt

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Folk Religion in Discourse and Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this