Abstract
‘Folk religion’ is a contested category within the study of religions, with scholars increasingly advocating its abandonment. This paper encourages a new critical engagement with ‘folk religion’ as both a category of analysis and as a field of prac-tice. I argue for a renewed attentiveness to the ideological dimensions of categories deployed by scholars and to the relationship they bear to the field of practice they seek to signify. Firstly, I explore the discursive nature of the construction of ‘folk religion’ as a category of analysis and how its semantic loading functions to ‘pick up’ distinctive practices from the religious field. Secondly, drawing on the work of Bourdieu and Riesebrodt, I characterise the ‘folk religious field of practice’ as relational, a shifting site of competing agencies. My argument is illustrated with empirical examples drawn from ethnographic research in Romania and Moldova
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3-18 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2013 |
Keywords
- folk religion
- vernacular religion
- Romania
- Bourdieu
- Riesebrodt