From intersectionality to interference: FEMINIST onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article reviews the debate on 'intersectionality' as the dominant approach in gender studies, with an emphasis on the politics of representation. The debate on intersectionality officially began in the late 1980s, though the approach can be traced back to the institutionalization of women's studies in the 1970s and the feminist movement of the 1960s. Black and lesbian feminists have long advocated hyphenated identities to be the backbone of feminist thought. But in recent years, intersectionality has sustained criticism from numerous angles within gender studies, ranging from feminist philosophy to applied political research. This article will use the theorization of 'interference' as a searchlight to produce an overview of this interdisciplinary debate, culminating in our affirmative answer to the question: should we move from intersectionality to interference? Our answer is based on onto-epistemological reflections, i.e., reflections in which being and knowing are always already entangled.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-178
Number of pages8
JournalWomen's Studies International Forum
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From intersectionality to interference: FEMINIST onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this