Gender, confidence, and the mismeasure of intelligence, competitiveness, and literacy

  • Glenn Harrison
  • , Don Ross
  • , J. Todd Swarthout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The measurement of intelligence should identify and measure an individual’s subjective confidence that a response to a test question is correct. Existing measures do not do that, nor do they use extrinsic financial incentive for truthful responses. We rectify both issues and show that each matters for the measurement of intelligence, particularly for women. Our results on gender and confidence in the face of risk have wider applications in terms of the measurement of “competitiveness” and financial literacy. Contrary to received literature, women are more intelligent than men, compete when they should in risky settings, and are more literate.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
Pages (from-to)665-730
JournalJournal of Political Economy
Volume134
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jan 2026

Keywords

  • Measurement of intelligence
  • Gender
  • Competition
  • Women
  • Risk
  • Confidence
  • [SocietyPoliticsEthics]

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender, confidence, and the mismeasure of intelligence, competitiveness, and literacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this