General versus regional anaesthesia for cataract surgery: Effects on neutrophil apoptosis and the postoperative pro-inflammatory state

  • Y. Goto
  • , S. L. Ho
  • , J. McAdoo
  • , N. F. Fanning
  • , J. Wang
  • , H. P. Redmond
  • , G. D. Shorten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

At clinically relevant concentrations, volatile anaesthetic agents influence neutrophil function. Our hypothesis was that sevoflurane would inhibit neutrophil apoptosis and consequently influence the post-operative pro-inflammatory state. In order to identify selectively the effect of the anaesthetic agent sevoflurane, we studied patients undergoing minimally stimulating (cataract) surgery randomly allocated to receive either sevoflurane (n = 11) or local anaesthesia (n = 12). Venous blood samples were taken immediately prior to anaesthesia and at 1, 8 and 24h thereafter. The rate of neutrophil apoptosis, plasma concentration of cytokines and differential white cell count were measured. The rates of neutrophil apoptosis and plasma concentrations of IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-8 at each time point were similar in the two groups. IL-6 concentrations increased significantly and to a similar extent compared to preanaesthetic levels at 8 and 24h. This study demonstrates that sevoflurane does not influence the rate of neutrophil apoptosis, cytokine concentrations and neutrophil count following cataract surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)474-480
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology
Volume17
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Keywords

  • Anaesthetics, inhalation, sevoflurane
  • Cell death, apoptosis
  • Immune system, phagocytes, neutrophils
  • Immunity, neutrophil activation
  • Inflammatory mediators, chemokines
  • Ophthalmological surgical procedures, cataract extraction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'General versus regional anaesthesia for cataract surgery: Effects on neutrophil apoptosis and the postoperative pro-inflammatory state'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this