Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering education during the pandemic

  • Ning Jun Jiang
  • , James L. Hanson
  • , Gabriele Della Vecchia
  • , Cheng Zhu
  • , Yaolin Yi
  • , Dali N. Arnepalli
  • , Benoit Courcelles
  • , Jia He
  • , Suksun Horpibulsuk
  • , Menglim Hoy
  • , Akihiro Takahashi
  • , Arul Arulrajah
  • , Chih Ping Lin
  • , Osama Dowoud
  • , Zili Li
  • , Zhiwei Gao
  • , Toshiro Hata
  • , Limin Zhang
  • , Yan Jun Du
  • , Venkata Siva Naga Sai Goli
  • Arif Mohammad, Prithvendra Singh, Ganaraj Kuntikana, Devendra N. Singh
  • Southeast University, Nanjing
  • University of Hawaii at Mānoa
  • California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
  • Polytechnic University of Milan
  • Rowan University
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Indian Institute of Technology Madras
  • Polytechnique Montréal
  • Hohai University
  • Suranaree University of Technology
  • Institute of Science Tokyo
  • Istinye University
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  • University of Glasgow
  • Hiroshima University
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper reports the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on the practice and delivery of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering (GGE) education modules, including lectures, lab sessions, student assessments and research activities, based on the feedback from faculty members in 14 countries/regions around the world. Faculty members have since adopted a series of contingent measures to enhance teaching and learning experience during the pandemic, which includes facilitating active learning, exploring new teaching content related to public health, expanding e-learning resources, implementing more engaged and student-centred assessment and delivering high-impact integrated education and research. The key challenges that faculty members are facing appear to be how to maximise the flexibility of learning and meet physical distancing requirements without compromising learning outcomes, education equity and interpersonal interactions in the traditional face-to-face teaching. Despite the challenges imposed by the pandemic, this could also be a good opportunity for faculty members obliged to lecture, to rethink and revise the existing contents and approaches of professing GGE education. Three future opportunities namely, smart learning, flipped learning and interdisciplinary education, are identified. The changes could potentially provide students with a more resilient, engaged, interactive and technology-based learning environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-243
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironmental Geotechnics
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • geoenvironment
  • geotechnical engineering
  • public policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering education during the pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this