Abstract
This paper looks at the application of peer instruction via in-class concept questions, an approach based on a constructivist conception of learning (as opposed to a 'transmissionist' model) that facilitates the engagement of learners through active learning opportunities (Smith et al, 2009). This approach has been adopted using both 'high tech' (clickers) and 'low tech' (flashcards) approaches (Mazur, 1997, 2009), whereby crucially, 'no significant differences were found in conceptual learning gains' between either approach (Lasry, 2008). The current paper considers the use of flashcards to facilitate peer discussion and learning in a fluid mechanics module and elicits learner reflections on how this approach better facilitates learning relative to a 'traditional' lecturing approaches. It also reflects on how this approach compares with other technological innovations aimed at supporting learning. Conclusions are drawn around the need to place the pedagogical horse ahead of the technological cart when considering teaching approaches.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
| Event | 6th Research in Engineering Education Symposium: Translating Research into Practice, REES 2015 - Dublin, Ireland Duration: 13 Jul 2015 → 15 Jul 2015 |
Conference
| Conference | 6th Research in Engineering Education Symposium: Translating Research into Practice, REES 2015 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Ireland |
| City | Dublin |
| Period | 13/07/15 → 15/07/15 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'High or low tech approaches to teaching and learning? The value of pedagogical soundness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver