Abstract
Drawing on a corpus of books by conservative, right-wing or reactionary authors–together termed ‘counter-critics’–this article examines how they represent their opponents’ ideas as ‘tyranny’, as ‘authoritarian’ or even ‘totalitarian’. Rather than offering a theoretical account of ‘power’, the approach here follows a Foucauldian approach to ‘problematisation’, examining how ‘power’ is represented in discourse. Beyond tracing how counter-critics denounce their opponents as ‘tyrannical’, what emerges here is how a special power is attributed to words and ideas, both to enchant people with ideology and to dispel such delusions. Finally, this article offers reflexive considerations concerning the practice of critique. © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-17 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Political Power |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 21 Apr 2026 |
Keywords
- Critique
- Discourse
- Foucault
- Ideology
- Power
- [SocietyPoliticsEthics]
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How counter-critique problematises power: on the ‘tyranny’ of ideas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver