How does multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis compare to gold standard Computed Tomography assessment of body composition in a cancer population?

Aoife Ryan

doi:10.1017/s0029665115003092

How does multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis compare to gold standard Computed Tomography assessment of body composition in a cancer population?

Aoife Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Journal	Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665115003092
Publication status	Published - 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

Bioelectrical impedance analysis
Gold standard (test)
Composition (language)
Computed tomography
Population
Computer science
Medicine
Radiology
Internal medicine
Body mass index
Environmental health
Linguistics
Philosophy

Access to Document

10.1017/s0029665115003092

https://openalex.org/W2606101976Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{446459913c3a44b4b50f41da5cebfd1a,

title = "How does multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis compare to gold standard Computed Tomography assessment of body composition in a cancer population?",

keywords = "Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Gold standard (test), Composition (language), Computed tomography, Population, Computer science, Medicine, Radiology, Internal medicine, Body mass index, Environmental health, Linguistics, Philosophy",

author = "Aoife Ryan",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1017/s0029665115003092",

language = "English",

journal = "Proceedings of the Nutrition Society",