Abstract
One of the goals of Explainable Artificial Intelligence is to enhance users’ understanding of model function and inferential capabilities by providing human-understandable explanations. An Artificial Neural Network has been trained, and interpretable decision rules have been extracted through the C4.5 algorithm. These rules were integrated into a dynamic, interactive interface that allows users to visualise and understand the inferential mechanisms behind model predictions. To rigorously assess the explainability of these rules, this research introduces a user-centred and culturally adapted evaluation, via psychometrics, of two questionnaires for XAI: the System Causability Scale and a multi-dimensional XAI scale. Findings demonstrated acceptable reliability for both questionnaires and an acceptable level of construct validity. Beyond scale translation, this research contributes to knowledge by providing a rigorously validated Italian version of existing explainability and causability questionnaires, enabling reliable cross-cultural evaluation of XAI systems and facilitating comparable empirical studies across linguistic and cultural contexts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2026 |
Keywords
- Human-centred evaluation
- Explainable artificial intelligence
- Interactive explanations
- Neural networks
- Psychometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Human-Centred Evaluation of an Interactive User Interface for Surrogate Decision Trees via Psychometrics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver