Husserl on shared intentionality and normativity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The paper offers a systematic reconstruction of the relations that, in Husserl’s work, bind together our shared social world (“the spiritual world”) with shared intentionality. It is claimed that, by sharing experiences, persons create social reasons and that these reasons impose a normative structure on the social world. Because there are two ways in which persons can share experiences (depending on whether these experiences rest on mutual communication or on group’s identity), social normativity comes in two kinds. It is either directed (it has an addressee) or it is collective or absolute (it applies to all group members). Social normativity should be distinguished from axiological normativity: The first is grounded in shared intentionality, the second in values.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)343-359
Number of pages17
JournalContinental Philosophy Review
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2023

Keywords

  • Absolute obligations
  • Directed obligations
  • Edmund Husserl
  • Motivation
  • Social normativity
  • Social world

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Husserl on shared intentionality and normativity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this