Abstract
The paper offers a systematic reconstruction of the relations that, in Husserl’s work, bind together our shared social world (“the spiritual world”) with shared intentionality. It is claimed that, by sharing experiences, persons create social reasons and that these reasons impose a normative structure on the social world. Because there are two ways in which persons can share experiences (depending on whether these experiences rest on mutual communication or on group’s identity), social normativity comes in two kinds. It is either directed (it has an addressee) or it is collective or absolute (it applies to all group members). Social normativity should be distinguished from axiological normativity: The first is grounded in shared intentionality, the second in values.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 343-359 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Continental Philosophy Review |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sep 2023 |
Keywords
- Absolute obligations
- Directed obligations
- Edmund Husserl
- Motivation
- Social normativity
- Social world
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Husserl on shared intentionality and normativity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver