Identifying homologous recombination deficiency in breast cancer: genomic instability score distributions differ among breast cancer subtypes

  • Lauren Lenz
  • , Chris Neff
  • , Cara Solimeno
  • , Elizabeth S. Cogan
  • , Vandana G. Abramson
  • , Judy C. Boughey
  • , Carla Falkson
  • , Matthew P. Goetz
  • , James M. Ford
  • , William J. Gradishar
  • , Rachel C. Jankowitz
  • , Virginia G. Kaklamani
  • , P. Kelly Marcom
  • , Andrea L. Richardson
  • , Anna Maria Storniolo
  • , Nadine M. Tung
  • , Shaveta Vinayak
  • , Darren R. Hodgson
  • , Zhongwu Lai
  • , Simon Dearden
  • Bryan T. Hennessy, Erica L. Mayer, Gordon B. Mills, Thomas P. Slavin, Alexander Gutin, Roisin M. Connolly, Melinda L. Telli, Vered Stearns, Jerry S. Lanchbury, Kirsten M. Timms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: A 3-biomarker homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score is a key component of a currently FDA-approved companion diagnostic assay to identify HRD in patients with ovarian cancer using a threshold score of ≥ 42, though recent studies have explored the utility of a lower threshold (GIS ≥ 33). The present study evaluated whether the ovarian cancer thresholds may also be appropriate for major breast cancer subtypes by comparing the genomic instability score (GIS) distributions of BRCA1/2-deficient estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer (ER + BC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to the GIS distribution of BRCA1/2-deficient ovarian cancer. Methods: Ovarian cancer and breast cancer (ER + BC and TNBC) tumors from ten study cohorts were sequenced to identify pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, and GIS was calculated using a previously described algorithm. Pathologic complete response (pCR) to platinum therapy was evaluated in a subset of TNBC samples. For TNBC, a threshold was set and threshold validity was assessed relative to clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 560 ovarian cancer, 805 ER + BC, and 443 TNBC tumors were included. Compared to ovarian cancer, the GIS distribution of BRCA1/2-deficient samples was shifted lower for ER + BC (p = 0.015), but not TNBC (p = 0.35). In the subset of TNBC samples, univariable logistic regression models revealed that GIS status using thresholds of ≥ 42 and ≥ 33 were significant predictors of response to platinum therapy. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the GIS thresholds used for ovarian cancer may also be appropriate for TNBC, but not ER + BC. GIS thresholds in TNBC were validated using clinical response data to platinum therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-201
Number of pages11
JournalBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume202
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • DNA damage
  • Genomic instability
  • Homologous recombination deficiency
  • Tumor biomarker

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying homologous recombination deficiency in breast cancer: genomic instability score distributions differ among breast cancer subtypes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this