TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementing a complex mental health intervention in occupational settings
T2 - process evaluation of the MENTUPP pilot study
AU - Tsantila, Fotini
AU - Coppens, Evelien
AU - De Witte, Hans
AU - Arensman, Ella
AU - Aust, Birgit
AU - Pashoja, Arlinda Cerga
AU - Corcoran, Paul
AU - Cully, Grace
AU - De Winter, Lars
AU - Doukani, Asmae
AU - Dushaj, Arilda
AU - Fanaj, Naim
AU - Griffin, Eve
AU - Hogg, Bridget
AU - Holland, Carolyn
AU - Leduc, Caleb
AU - Leduc, Mallorie
AU - Mathieu, Sharna
AU - Maxwell, Margaret
AU - Ni Dhalaigh, Doireann
AU - O'Brien, Cliodhna
AU - Reich, Hanna
AU - Ditta Tóth, Mónika
AU - Van Weeghel, Jaap
AU - Van Audenhove, Chantal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2023.
PY - 2023/12/14
Y1 - 2023/12/14
N2 - Background According to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, the theorisation of how multilevel, multicomponent interventions work and the understanding of their interaction with their implementation context are necessary to be able to evaluate them beyond their complexity. More research is needed to provide good examples following this approach in order to produce evidence-based information on implementation practices. Objectives This article reports on the results of the process evaluation of a complex mental health intervention in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) tested through a pilot study. The overarching aim is to contribute to the evidence base related to the recruitment, engagement and implementation strategies of applied mental health interventions in the workplace. Method The Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings (MENTUPP) intervention was pilot tested in 25 SMEs in three work sectors and nine countries. The evaluation strategy of the pilot test relied on a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. The process evaluation was inspired by the RE-AIM framework and the taxonomy of implementation outcomes suggested by Proctor and colleagues and focused on seven dimensions: reach, adoption, implementation, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and maintenance. Results Factors facilitating implementation included the variety of the provided materials, the support provided by the research officers (ROs) and the existence of a structured plan for implementation, among others. Main barriers to implementation were the difficulty of talking about mental health, familiarisation with technology, difficulty in fitting the intervention into the daily routine and restrictions caused by COVID-19. Conclusions The results will be used to optimise the MENTUPP intervention and the theoretical framework that we developed to evaluate the causal mechanisms underlying MENTUPP. Conducting this systematic and comprehensive process evaluation contributes to the enhancement of the evidence base related to mental health interventions in the workplace and it can be used as a guide to overcome their contextual complexity. Trial registration number ISRCTN14582090.
AB - Background According to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, the theorisation of how multilevel, multicomponent interventions work and the understanding of their interaction with their implementation context are necessary to be able to evaluate them beyond their complexity. More research is needed to provide good examples following this approach in order to produce evidence-based information on implementation practices. Objectives This article reports on the results of the process evaluation of a complex mental health intervention in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) tested through a pilot study. The overarching aim is to contribute to the evidence base related to the recruitment, engagement and implementation strategies of applied mental health interventions in the workplace. Method The Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings (MENTUPP) intervention was pilot tested in 25 SMEs in three work sectors and nine countries. The evaluation strategy of the pilot test relied on a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. The process evaluation was inspired by the RE-AIM framework and the taxonomy of implementation outcomes suggested by Proctor and colleagues and focused on seven dimensions: reach, adoption, implementation, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and maintenance. Results Factors facilitating implementation included the variety of the provided materials, the support provided by the research officers (ROs) and the existence of a structured plan for implementation, among others. Main barriers to implementation were the difficulty of talking about mental health, familiarisation with technology, difficulty in fitting the intervention into the daily routine and restrictions caused by COVID-19. Conclusions The results will be used to optimise the MENTUPP intervention and the theoretical framework that we developed to evaluate the causal mechanisms underlying MENTUPP. Conducting this systematic and comprehensive process evaluation contributes to the enhancement of the evidence base related to mental health interventions in the workplace and it can be used as a guide to overcome their contextual complexity. Trial registration number ISRCTN14582090.
KW - MENTAL HEALTH
KW - PUBLIC HEALTH
KW - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85179901553
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077093
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077093
M3 - Article
C2 - 38101839
AN - SCOPUS:85179901553
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 13
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 12
M1 - e077093
ER -