Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Improving trial recruitment processes: How qualitative methodologies can be used to address the top 10 research priorities identified within the PRioRiTy study

  • Marita Hennessy
  • , Andrew Hunter
  • , Patricia Healy
  • , Sandra Galvin
  • , Catherine Houghton
  • University of Galway
  • Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

How can we improve recruitment to trials? In their recently published paper, Healy et al. outline the top 10 prioritised questions for trial recruitment research identified by the PRioRiTy study. The challenge now is for researchers to answer these questions; but how best can these be answered? In this commentary, we illustrate how qualitative research can be utilised to generate in-depth insight into trial recruitment issues, either as a stand-alone methodology, or through a mixed-methods approach. Consideration is given to how different forms of qualitative research can be used to address these priorities and to help researchers set out an agenda to optimise its value.

Original languageEnglish
Article number584
JournalCurrent Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Oct 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Documentary analysis
  • Focus groups
  • Interviews
  • Mixed-methods
  • Observation
  • Priorities
  • Qualitative
  • Qualitative evidence synthesis
  • Randomised trials
  • RCT
  • Trial methodology
  • Trial recruitment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving trial recruitment processes: How qualitative methodologies can be used to address the top 10 research priorities identified within the PRioRiTy study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this