Interactions between antidepressants and P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier: Clinical significance of in vitro and in vivo findings

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The drug efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp) plays an important role in the function of the blood-brain barrier by selectively extruding certain endogenous and exogenous molecules, thus limiting the ability of its substrates to reach the brain. Emerging evidence suggests that P-gp may restrict the uptake of several antidepressants into the brain, thus contributing to the poor success rate of current antidepressant therapies. Despite some inconsistency in the literature, clinical investigations of potential associations between functional single nucleotide polymorphisms in ABCB1, the gene which encodes P-gp, and antidepressant response have highlighted a potential link between P-gp function and treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Therefore, co-administration of P-gp inhibitors with antidepressants to patients who are refractory to antidepressant therapy may represent a novel therapeutic approach in the management of TRD. Furthermore, certain antidepressants inhibit P-gp in vitro, and it has been hypothesized that inhibition of P-gp by such antidepressant drugs may play a role in their therapeutic action. The present review summarizes the available in vitro, in vivo and clinical data pertaining to interactions between antidepressant drugs and P-gp, and discusses the potential relevance of these interactions in the treatment of depression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-312
Number of pages24
JournalBritish Journal of Pharmacology
Volume165
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Keywords

  • ABC drug efflux transporter
  • ABCB1
  • antidepressant
  • blood-brain barrier
  • MDR1
  • P-glycoprotein
  • treatment-resistant depression

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interactions between antidepressants and P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier: Clinical significance of in vitro and in vivo findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this