Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

International consensus statement on microbiome testing in clinical practice

  • Serena Porcari
  • , Benjamin H. Mullish
  • , Francesco Asnicar
  • , Siew C. Ng
  • , Liping Zhao
  • , Richard Hansen
  • , Paul W. O'Toole
  • , Jeroen Raes
  • , Georgina Hold
  • , Lorenza Putignani
  • , Christian Lodberg Hvas
  • , Georg Zeller
  • , Omry Koren
  • , Hein Tun
  • , Mireia Valles-Colomer
  • , Maria Carmen Collado
  • , Monika Fischer
  • , Jessica Allegretti
  • , Tariq Iqbal
  • , Benoit Chassaing
  • Josbert Keller, Simon Mark Baunwall, Maria Abreu, Giovanni Barbara, Faming Zhang, Francesca Romana Ponziani, Sam P. Costello, Sudarshan Paramsothy, Dina Kao, Colleen Kelly, Juozas Kupcinskas, Ilan Youngster, Francesco Franceschi, Sahil Khanna, Maria Vehreschild, Alexander Link, Flavio De Maio, Edoardo Pasolli, Aitor Blanco Miguez, Patrizia Brigidi, Brunella Posteraro, Franco Scaldaferri, Mirjana Rajilic Stojanovic, Francis Megraud, Peter Malfertheiner, Luca Masucci, Manimozhiyan Arumugam, Nadeem Kaakoush, Eran Segal, Jasmohan Bajaj, Rupert Leong, John Cryan, Rinse K. Weersma, Robert Knight, Francisco Guarner, Fergus Shanahan, Patrice D. Cani, Eran Elinav, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Willem M. de Vos, Emad El-Omar, Joel Dorè, Julian Marchesi, Herbert Tilg, Harry Sokol, Nicola Segata, Giovanni Cammarota, Antonio Gasbarrini, Gianluca Ianiro
  • Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
  • Imperial College London
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
  • University of Trento
  • Microbiota I-Center (MagIC)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • University of Dundee
  • KU Leuven
  • Flanders Institute for Biotechnology
  • University of New South Wales
  • IRCCS Ospedale pediatrico Bambino Gesù - Roma
  • Aarhus University
  • Leiden University
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • Bar-Ilan University
  • Pompeu Fabra University
  • Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology-National Research Council (IATA-CSIC)
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Birmingham
  • Université Paris Cité
  • University of Miami
  • University of Bologna
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
  • Nanjing Medical University
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Australia
  • University of Adelaide
  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital
  • The University of Sydney
  • University of Alberta
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
  • Tel Aviv University
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Goethe University Frankfurt
  • Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg
  • University of Naples Federico II
  • University of Belgrade
  • Université de Bordeaux
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Weizmann Institute of Science
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Macquarie University
  • University of Groningen
  • University of California at San Diego
  • Centro Medico Teknon
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • WEL Research Institute
  • German Cancer Research Center
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • University of Helsinki
  • Université Paris-Saclay
  • Innsbruck Medical University
  • Sorbonne Université
  • Paris Center for Microbiome MedICIsne (PaCeMM) FHU
  • IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - Milano

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

There is growing interest in the potential exploitation of the gut microbiome as a diagnostic tool in medicine, but evidence supporting its clinical usefulness is scarce. An increasing number of commercial providers offer direct-to-consumer microbiome diagnostic tests without any consensus on their regulation or any proven value in clinical practice, which could result in considerable waste of individual and health-care resources and potential drawbacks in the clinical management of patients. We convened an international multidisciplinary expert panel to standardise best practices of microbiome testing for clinical implementation, including recommendations on general principles and minimum requirements for their provision, indications, pre-testing protocols, method of analyses, reporting of results, and potential clinical value. We also evaluated current knowledge gaps and future directions in this field. We aimed to establish a framework to regulate the provision of microbiome testing and minimise the use of inappropriate tests and pave the way for the evidence-based development and use of human microbiome diagnostics in clinical medicine.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)154-167
Number of pages14
JournalThe Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International consensus statement on microbiome testing in clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this