TY - JOUR
T1 - Internet delivery of intensive speech and language therapy for children with cerebral palsy
T2 - A pilot randomised controlled trial
AU - Pennington, Lindsay
AU - Stamp, Elaine
AU - Smith, Johanna
AU - Kelly, Helen
AU - Parker, Naomi
AU - Stockwell, Katy
AU - Aluko, Patricia
AU - Othman, Mohammad
AU - Brittain, Katie
AU - Vale, Luke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Objectives To test the feasibility of recruitment, retention, outcome measures and internet delivery of dysarthria therapy for young people with cerebral palsy in a randomised controlled trial. Design Mixed methods. Single blind pilot randomised controlled trial, with control offered Skype therapy at end of study. Qualitative study of the acceptability of therapy delivery via Skype. Setting Nine speech and language therapy departments in northern England recruited participants to the study. Skype therapy was provided in a university setting. Participants Twenty-two children (14 M, 8 F) with dysarthria and cerebral palsy (mean age 8.8 years (SD 3.2)) agreed to take part. Participants were randomised to dysarthria therapy via Skype (n=11) or treatment as usual (n=11). Interventions Children received either usual speech therapy from their local therapist for 6 weeks or dysarthria therapy via Skype from a research therapist. Usual therapy sessions varied in frequency, duration and content. Skype dysarthria therapy focused on breath control and phonation to produce clear speech at a steady rate, and comprised three 40 min sessions per week for 6 weeks. Primary and secondary outcome measures Feasibility and acceptability of the trial design, intervention and outcome measures. Results Departments recruited two to three participants. All participants agreed to random allocation. None withdrew from the study. Recordings of children's speech were made at all time points and rated by listeners. Families allocated to Skype dysarthria therapy judged internet delivery of the therapy to be acceptable. All families reported that the study design was acceptable. Treatment integrity checks suggested that the phrases practised in one therapy exercise should be reduced in length. Conclusions A delayed treatment design, in which dysarthria therapy is offered at the end of the study to families allocated to treatment as usual, is acceptable. A randomised controlled trial of internet delivered dysarthria therapy is feasible.
AB - Objectives To test the feasibility of recruitment, retention, outcome measures and internet delivery of dysarthria therapy for young people with cerebral palsy in a randomised controlled trial. Design Mixed methods. Single blind pilot randomised controlled trial, with control offered Skype therapy at end of study. Qualitative study of the acceptability of therapy delivery via Skype. Setting Nine speech and language therapy departments in northern England recruited participants to the study. Skype therapy was provided in a university setting. Participants Twenty-two children (14 M, 8 F) with dysarthria and cerebral palsy (mean age 8.8 years (SD 3.2)) agreed to take part. Participants were randomised to dysarthria therapy via Skype (n=11) or treatment as usual (n=11). Interventions Children received either usual speech therapy from their local therapist for 6 weeks or dysarthria therapy via Skype from a research therapist. Usual therapy sessions varied in frequency, duration and content. Skype dysarthria therapy focused on breath control and phonation to produce clear speech at a steady rate, and comprised three 40 min sessions per week for 6 weeks. Primary and secondary outcome measures Feasibility and acceptability of the trial design, intervention and outcome measures. Results Departments recruited two to three participants. All participants agreed to random allocation. None withdrew from the study. Recordings of children's speech were made at all time points and rated by listeners. Families allocated to Skype dysarthria therapy judged internet delivery of the therapy to be acceptable. All families reported that the study design was acceptable. Treatment integrity checks suggested that the phrases practised in one therapy exercise should be reduced in length. Conclusions A delayed treatment design, in which dysarthria therapy is offered at the end of the study to families allocated to treatment as usual, is acceptable. A randomised controlled trial of internet delivered dysarthria therapy is feasible.
KW - clinical trials
KW - speech pathology
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85060949289
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024233
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024233
M3 - Article
C2 - 30705241
AN - SCOPUS:85060949289
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 9
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 1
M1 - e024233
ER -