Interprofessional communication in the hospital setting: a systematic review of the qualitative literature

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Communication plays a key role in the provision of safe patient care, and miscommunication in healthcare can lead to avoidable patient harm or mortality. Interprofessional communication (IPCom) can be challenging due to differences in training, education and roles between healthcare professions. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the qualitative evidence regarding healthcare providers’ perceptions of interprofessional communication in the hospital setting. Four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Embase) were searched for studies that met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies were identified as suitable for inclusion in the review and were examined using thematic synthesis. Thematic synthesis led to the development of five descriptive themes: 1) ‘Hierarchy”, 2) “Interprofessional Ethos,” 3) “Healthcare Environment,” 4) “Personal Factors” and 5) “Methods of Communication,” and two overarching analytical themes: “Barriers to Communication” and “Facilitators to Communication.” Personal factors, such as strong interprofessional relationships, were found to be important facilitators to IPCom, while organizational factors, such as challenging and hierarchical working environments, were found to pose barriers to IPCom.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-213
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Interprofessional Care
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • interdisciplinary communication
  • interprofessional care
  • Interprofessional communication
  • patient safety
  • qualitative research
  • systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interprofessional communication in the hospital setting: a systematic review of the qualitative literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this