TY - JOUR
T1 - Interprofessional communication in the hospital setting
T2 - a systematic review of the qualitative literature
AU - L. Gleeson, Laura
AU - O’Brien, G. L.
AU - O’Mahony, D.
AU - Byrne, S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Communication plays a key role in the provision of safe patient care, and miscommunication in healthcare can lead to avoidable patient harm or mortality. Interprofessional communication (IPCom) can be challenging due to differences in training, education and roles between healthcare professions. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the qualitative evidence regarding healthcare providers’ perceptions of interprofessional communication in the hospital setting. Four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Embase) were searched for studies that met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies were identified as suitable for inclusion in the review and were examined using thematic synthesis. Thematic synthesis led to the development of five descriptive themes: 1) ‘Hierarchy”, 2) “Interprofessional Ethos,” 3) “Healthcare Environment,” 4) “Personal Factors” and 5) “Methods of Communication,” and two overarching analytical themes: “Barriers to Communication” and “Facilitators to Communication.” Personal factors, such as strong interprofessional relationships, were found to be important facilitators to IPCom, while organizational factors, such as challenging and hierarchical working environments, were found to pose barriers to IPCom.
AB - Communication plays a key role in the provision of safe patient care, and miscommunication in healthcare can lead to avoidable patient harm or mortality. Interprofessional communication (IPCom) can be challenging due to differences in training, education and roles between healthcare professions. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the qualitative evidence regarding healthcare providers’ perceptions of interprofessional communication in the hospital setting. Four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Embase) were searched for studies that met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies were identified as suitable for inclusion in the review and were examined using thematic synthesis. Thematic synthesis led to the development of five descriptive themes: 1) ‘Hierarchy”, 2) “Interprofessional Ethos,” 3) “Healthcare Environment,” 4) “Personal Factors” and 5) “Methods of Communication,” and two overarching analytical themes: “Barriers to Communication” and “Facilitators to Communication.” Personal factors, such as strong interprofessional relationships, were found to be important facilitators to IPCom, while organizational factors, such as challenging and hierarchical working environments, were found to pose barriers to IPCom.
KW - interdisciplinary communication
KW - interprofessional care
KW - Interprofessional communication
KW - patient safety
KW - qualitative research
KW - systematic review
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85124333142
U2 - 10.1080/13561820.2022.2028746
DO - 10.1080/13561820.2022.2028746
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35109753
AN - SCOPUS:85124333142
SN - 1356-1820
VL - 37
SP - 203
EP - 213
JO - Journal of Interprofessional Care
JF - Journal of Interprofessional Care
IS - 2
ER -