Abstract
This chapter examines the constitutional conflict that occurs in the context of Ireland's rejection of the Lisbon Treaty. It begins by distinguishing the concepts "direct democracy" and "constitutional democracy" in order to clarify the importance of referenda if they are used as the constitutional amendability procedure in a functioning constitutional democracy. It then considers the place of amendability procedure in Irish constitutional history. It discusses Ireland's constitutional amendability procedure vis-à-vis European treaty referenda. The chapter concludes by examining the three ways in which Europe's constitutional ambitions are intimately tied up with national constitutional amendability procedures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Comparative Law as Transnational Law |
| Subtitle of host publication | A Decade of the German Law Journal |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780199919307 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780199795208 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 19 Jan 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Amendability procedure
- Constitutional democracy
- European constitution
- Ireland
- Irish constitutional history
- Lisbon treaty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ireland's Constitutional Amendability and Europe's Constitutional Ambition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver