Kantian Moral Education and Gendered Socialization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Movements like #metoo, #timesup, and #ibelieveher have succeeded in shedding light on the ongoing societal issue of misogyny. Against this backdrop, Kate Manne's attempt to analyze the concept of misogyny philosophically in her book Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny has rightfully received much acclaim. In this article, Katy Dineen takes Manne's ameliorative treatment of misogyny as the starting point for interrogating how Manne's theory might relate to the coercion of male identity and agency toward the ideal of hegemonic masculinity. Dineen notes that her motivation in questioning Manne's account on this point is pragmatic: she aims to provide a groundwork for moral education that will address the coercion of boys' and girls' agency and identity formation within patriarchy. Dineen concludes by describing a Kantian framework for moral education based on an idea of the freedom necessary to render oneself efficacious, autonomous, and creative. She also offers Manne's thoughts on empathy as a reason in support of adopting a Kantian framework.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)703-716
Number of pages14
JournalEducational Theory
Volume71
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • agency
  • feminism
  • gender
  • hegemonic masculinity
  • identity
  • Immanuel Kant
  • misogyny
  • moral education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Kantian Moral Education and Gendered Socialization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this