TY - CHAP
T1 - Lazy branching for constraint satisfaction
AU - Mehta, Deepak
AU - O'Sullivan, Barry
AU - Kotthoff, Lars
AU - Malitsky, Yuri
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - When solving a constraint satisfaction problem using a systematic backtracking method the branching scheme normally selects a variable to which a value is assigned. In this paper we refer to such strategies as eager branching schemes. These contrast with the alternative class of novel branchings considered in this paper whereby having selected a variable we proceed by removing values from its domain. In this paper we study such lazy branching schemes in depth. We define three lazy branchings based on k-way, binary and split branching. We show how each can be incorporated into MAC, and define a novel value ordering heuristic that is suitable in this setting. Our results show that lazy branching can significantly out-perform traditional branching schemes across a variety of problem classes. While, in general, neither lazy nor eager branching dominates the other, our results clearly show that choosing the correct branching scheme for a given problem instances can significantly reduce search effort. Therefore, we implemented a variety of branching portfolios for choosing amongst all of the branching strategies studied in this paper. The results demonstrate that a good branching scheme can be automatically selected for a given problem instances and that including lazy branching schemes in the portfolio significantly reduces runtime.
AB - When solving a constraint satisfaction problem using a systematic backtracking method the branching scheme normally selects a variable to which a value is assigned. In this paper we refer to such strategies as eager branching schemes. These contrast with the alternative class of novel branchings considered in this paper whereby having selected a variable we proceed by removing values from its domain. In this paper we study such lazy branching schemes in depth. We define three lazy branchings based on k-way, binary and split branching. We show how each can be incorporated into MAC, and define a novel value ordering heuristic that is suitable in this setting. Our results show that lazy branching can significantly out-perform traditional branching schemes across a variety of problem classes. While, in general, neither lazy nor eager branching dominates the other, our results clearly show that choosing the correct branching scheme for a given problem instances can significantly reduce search effort. Therefore, we implemented a variety of branching portfolios for choosing amongst all of the branching strategies studied in this paper. The results demonstrate that a good branching scheme can be automatically selected for a given problem instances and that including lazy branching schemes in the portfolio significantly reduces runtime.
KW - Branching Schemes
KW - Constraint Satisfaction Problems
KW - Search
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84897734689
U2 - 10.1109/ICTAI.2013.152
DO - 10.1109/ICTAI.2013.152
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84897734689
SN - 9781479929719
T3 - Proceedings - International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI
SP - 1012
EP - 1019
BT - Proceedings - 25th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI 2013
T2 - 25th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI 2013
Y2 - 4 November 2013 through 6 November 2013
ER -