Abstract
Despite progress toward SDG7, many people in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are projected to remain without access to clean energy by 2030 unless drastic measures are taken. Existing studies have largely focused on technological innovation in the Global North, producing a techno-centric bias that overlooks the complexities of energy access in non-Western contexts. This study addresses this gap by examining energy transitions in rural Ghana through the Political Ecology framework for Sustainable Energy Transition (PESET)—an integrated analytical model that synthesises energy justice, political ecology, and inclusive innovation. It provides novel empirical insights into how context-specific factors influence clean energy adoption and reinforce existing inequalities.
Through a reflexive thematic analysis of 43 qualitative key informant interviews, the study reveals the multidimensional nature of energy transitions and challenges dominant techno-centric paradigms by demonstrating how structural inequalities and power asymmetries shape participation, access, and outcomes in the transition process. The analysis identifies four adoption barriers (cost, availability, behavioural resistance, and limited awareness), four forms of exclusion (process, consumption, impact, and structural), and three dimensions of energy injustice (distributive, recognition, and procedural) that intersect to constrain a sustainable transition. Building on these insights, the study proposes a holistic pathway to support a more equitable and sustainable energy transition, offering actionable policy guidance and contributing to progress toward SDG7 in rural Ghana.
Through a reflexive thematic analysis of 43 qualitative key informant interviews, the study reveals the multidimensional nature of energy transitions and challenges dominant techno-centric paradigms by demonstrating how structural inequalities and power asymmetries shape participation, access, and outcomes in the transition process. The analysis identifies four adoption barriers (cost, availability, behavioural resistance, and limited awareness), four forms of exclusion (process, consumption, impact, and structural), and three dimensions of energy injustice (distributive, recognition, and procedural) that intersect to constrain a sustainable transition. Building on these insights, the study proposes a holistic pathway to support a more equitable and sustainable energy transition, offering actionable policy guidance and contributing to progress toward SDG7 in rural Ghana.
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 148231 |
| Journal | Journal of Cleaner Production |
| Volume | 557 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Apr 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
UCC Futures
- Sustainability Institute
Keywords
- Energy access
- Energy transition
- Exclusion
- Injustice
- Rural Ghana
- Sustainability
- [SustainabilityInstitute]
- [EngineeringArchitecture]
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Leapfrogging inequality? Navigating a pathway to cleaner energy in rural Ghana'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver