Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lip shape and position in class II division 2 malocclusion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether differences exist in the shape and position of the lips between Class II division 2 and Class I malocclusions. Materials and Methods: Lateral cephalometric radiographs of subjects with Class II division 2 (n = 30) and Class I (n = 30) incisor relationships were scanned at 300 dpi to produce digital images. These were subsequently digitized in random order. Twenty-one landmarks characterizing the upper and lower lips and the maxillary and mandibular central incisors were digitized. Procrustes algorithms optimally superimposed the landmark configurations to standardize size, location, and orientation. Discriminant analysis of the principal components of shape determined the differences between the Class II division 2 and Class I groups. Results: The shape and position of the upper and lower lips differed significantly between the Class II division 2 group and the Class I group (P < .001). Principal component (PC) 1 (46% of the variance) involved an increase in the thickness of the upper and lower lips in the Class II division 2 group. PC2 (11% of the variance) was characterized by a relatively higher lip line in the Class II division 2 group. Conclusions: The shape and position of the lips differ between Class II division 2 and Class I malocclusions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)739-744
Number of pages6
JournalAngle Orthodontist
Volume76
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Keywords

  • Cephalometry
  • Class II division 2
  • Lip position
  • Lip shape
  • Morphometry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lip shape and position in class II division 2 malocclusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this