Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study

  • Leigh Johnson
  • , Paul White
  • , Ranjeet Jeevan
  • , John Browne
  • , Carmel Gulliver-Clarke
  • , Joe O’Donoghue
  • , Syed Mohiuddin
  • , William Hollingworth
  • , Patricia Fairbrother
  • , Mairead MacKenzie
  • , Chris Holcombe
  • , Shelley Potter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Breast reconstruction is offered to improve quality of life for women after mastectomy for breast cancer, but information regarding the long-term patient-reported outcomes of different reconstruction procedures is currently lacking. The Brighter study aimed to evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in a population-based cohort. Methods: Women who underwent mastectomy with IBR for breast cancer in England between 1 January 2008 and 31 March 2009 were identified from National Health Service Hospital Episode Statistics. Surviving women were invited to complete the BREAST-Q, EQ-5D5L™, and ICECAP-A at least 12 years after the index procedure. Questionnaires were scored according to developers’ instructions and compared by IBR type. Results: Some 1236 women underwent IBR; 343 (27.8 per cent) had 2-stage expander/implant, 630 (51.0 per cent) latissimus dorsi, and 263 (21.3 per cent) abdominal flap reconstructions, with a mean(s.d.) follow-up of 13.3(0.5) years. Women who underwent abdominal flap reconstruction reported higher scores in all BREAST-Q domains than those who had other procedures. These differences remained statistically significant and clinically meaningful after adjusting for age, ethnicity, geographical region, socioeconomic status, smoking, BMI, and complications. The greatest difference was seen in scores for satisfaction with breasts; women who had abdominal flap reconstructions reported scores that were 13.17 (95 per cent c.i. 9.48 to 16.87) points; P < 0.001) higher than those among women who had two-stage expander/implant procedures. Women who underwent latissimus dorsi reconstruction reported significantly more pain/discomfort on the EQ-5D-5L™, but no other differences between procedures were seen. Conclusion: Long-term patient-reported outcomes are significantly better following abdominal flap reconstruction than other traditional procedure types. These findings should be shared with women considering IBR to help them make informed decisions about their surgical options.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1815-1823
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume110
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this