TY - JOUR
T1 - Lumpectomy cavity shaved margins do not impact re-excision rates in breast cancer patients
AU - Coopey, Suzanne B.
AU - Buckley, Julliette M.
AU - Smith, Barbara L.
AU - Hughes, Kevin S.
AU - Gadd, Michele A.
AU - Specht, Michelle C.
PY - 2011/10
Y1 - 2011/10
N2 - Background: The benefits of taking shaved cavity margins (SCM) at the time of lumpectomy are unclear. We sought to determine if taking SCM decreases re-excision rates by increasing the total breast tissue volume excised. Methods: We undertook a retrospective review of breast cancer patients who underwent lumpectomy from 2004 to 2006. Patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 had lumpectomy alone, group 2 had lumpectomy plus select (1-3) SCM, and group 3 had lumpectomy plus complete (≥4) SCM. Pathologic findings and surgical outcomes were compared between groups. Results:773 cancers treated by lumpectomy were included in this study;197 were in group 1, 130 were in group 2, and 446 were in group 3. The mean total volume of breast tissue excised in group 1 (106.6 cm 3) was significantly larger than the volume excised in groups 2 (79.3 cm 3) and 3 (76.3 cm 3). Rates of re-excision and successful breastconservation therapy (BCT) were not significantly different between groups. Despite a lower total volume of breast tissue excised in groups 2 and 3, there was no significant increase in locoregional recurrence rates (LRR) at median follow-up of 54 months. Conclusions: Taking additional SCM during lumpectomy resulted in a significantly lower overall volume of breast tissue excised, with no increase in LRR. Contrary to prior studies, we found that SCM did not decrease re-excision rates or impact the success of BCT. Therefore, the main advantage of taking SCM appears to be that less breast tissue is excised, which could potentially improve cosmetic outcomes.
AB - Background: The benefits of taking shaved cavity margins (SCM) at the time of lumpectomy are unclear. We sought to determine if taking SCM decreases re-excision rates by increasing the total breast tissue volume excised. Methods: We undertook a retrospective review of breast cancer patients who underwent lumpectomy from 2004 to 2006. Patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 had lumpectomy alone, group 2 had lumpectomy plus select (1-3) SCM, and group 3 had lumpectomy plus complete (≥4) SCM. Pathologic findings and surgical outcomes were compared between groups. Results:773 cancers treated by lumpectomy were included in this study;197 were in group 1, 130 were in group 2, and 446 were in group 3. The mean total volume of breast tissue excised in group 1 (106.6 cm 3) was significantly larger than the volume excised in groups 2 (79.3 cm 3) and 3 (76.3 cm 3). Rates of re-excision and successful breastconservation therapy (BCT) were not significantly different between groups. Despite a lower total volume of breast tissue excised in groups 2 and 3, there was no significant increase in locoregional recurrence rates (LRR) at median follow-up of 54 months. Conclusions: Taking additional SCM during lumpectomy resulted in a significantly lower overall volume of breast tissue excised, with no increase in LRR. Contrary to prior studies, we found that SCM did not decrease re-excision rates or impact the success of BCT. Therefore, the main advantage of taking SCM appears to be that less breast tissue is excised, which could potentially improve cosmetic outcomes.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/83055179075
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-011-1909-7
DO - 10.1245/s10434-011-1909-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 21947583
AN - SCOPUS:83055179075
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 18
SP - 3036
EP - 3040
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 11
ER -