Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Managing root caries with silver diamine fluoride, sodium fluoride and direct restorations: A cost-effectiveness analysis

  • Shijia Hu
  • , Catherine Hsu Ling Hong
  • , Xiaoli Gao
  • , Hwee-Lin Wee
  • , Yi Wang
  • , Bien Wen Pui Lai
  • , Shenna Yu-En Ho
  • , Patrick Finbarr Allen
  • , Sharon Hui Xuan Tan
  • National University of Singapore
  • National Dental Centre Singapore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) relative to sodium fluoride (NaF) and traditional resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIC) restorations for the management of root caries in older adults aged 60 and above.

METHODS: A Markov model design was chosen and two models were constructed: 1) Clinic-based model - with access to dental facility that allows for placement of traditional restorations, 2) Community-based model - without access to dental facility due to mobility, lack of executive function, or financial barriers. Modelling was done over a 10-year time horizon with a cycle length of one year. Data on transition probabilities and relative risks were obtained from published literature for the base case. Outcomes of interest were incremental cost per incremental caries-controlled year and incremental cost per incremental extraction-free year. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainty in the base case.

RESULTS: In the clinic-based model, both SDF and NaF were dominated by traditional RMGIC restorations, which had lower cost, and higher number of caries-controlled and extraction-free years, with a 90% probability of being cost-effective. In the community-based model, NaF was dominated by SDF, which incurred lower cost and resulted in a higher number of caries-controlled and extraction-free years, with almost 100% probability of being cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS: Traditional RMGIC restoration was the most cost-effective option for managing root caries when full dental facility is available. In situations where treatment is provided in a community setting, SDF was more cost-effective than NaF.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Based on limited clinical studies and within the Singapore oral health system, traditional RMGIC restoration was most cost-effective in clinical settings for managing root caries, while SDF was most cost-effective in community settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106093
JournalJournal of Dentistry
Volume162
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Root Caries/therapy
  • Silver Compounds/economics
  • Cariostatic Agents/economics
  • Quaternary Ammonium Compounds/economics
  • Glass Ionomer Cements/economics
  • Sodium Fluoride/economics
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent/economics
  • Aged
  • Markov Chains
  • Middle Aged
  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
  • Fluorides, Topical

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Managing root caries with silver diamine fluoride, sodium fluoride and direct restorations: A cost-effectiveness analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this