Mitochondrial DNA copy number is not associated with fatigue status in Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome*

  • Eliane C.Soares De Menezes
  • , Audrey E. Brown
  • , Simon J. Bowman
  • , Kamran Mirza
  • , Julia L. Newton
  • , Wan Fai Ng
  • , Joanna L. Elson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by lymphocytic infiltrates to the exocrine glands, causing sicca symptoms and other manifestations. Fatigue is one of the most prominent symptom in pSS; up to 70% suffer from chronic fatigue. Fatigue has been shown to be common and severe in patients suffering from primary mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) disease. In a number of chronic diseases, mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNAcn) has been reported to be altered. Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine if mtDNAcn was altered in fatigued versus non-fatigued pSS. Methods: We quantified mtDNAcn using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with mitochondrial ND2 as a target gene normalized to nuclear HβB (mtDNA:nDNA). Results: In 204 participants, 108 fatigued and 96 non-fatigued, relative mtDNAcn did not distinguish fatigue status (p = 0.7) nor was it correlated with severity of fatigue (p = 0.21). Conclusions: MtDNAcn is not altered with fatigue status in blood in pSS. Our analysis suggests that when conducting mtDNAcn analysis with large sample numbers over multiple days a two-way-ANOVA should be used in preference to a one-way-ANOVA or t-test to allow detection of batch effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-131
Number of pages9
JournalFatigue: Biomedicine, Health and Behavior
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • fatigue
  • Mitochondria
  • mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNAcn)
  • mtDNA
  • Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mitochondrial DNA copy number is not associated with fatigue status in Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome*'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this