Abstract
Working in Chemical Biological (CB) protective equipment causes thermoregulatory strain by restricting evaporative cooling. We quantified which impermeable ancillary items [gloves(G), body armour liner(BAL), respirator(R) and overboots(OB)] imposed the greatest and the least thermoregulatory strain through restricting evaporative cooling. The study was a five-condition repeated-measures design with male volunteers (n = 13) who stepped intermittently with recovery periods in a desert-like environment (40.5 °C, 20% rh). Conditions varied in the ensemble worn, with a matched weight secured to the area when an item was not worn: CON(CB suit plus all items), N R (no R), N BAL (no BAL [170g liner]), N G (no G) and N OB (no OB). The greatest reduction in thermoregulatory strain compared with CON occurred in N G when the rise of rectal temperature was attenuated by 0.37 °C.hr −1 (p <.001), extending tolerance time by 21.3% (p <.05) and improving perceived thermal comfort. The least improvement occurred for N OB . It is recommended that the G permeability be examined further. Practitioner summary: Thermoregulatory strain was quantified when wearing impermeable protective equipment. The thermal burden of intermittent exercise in desert-like environments was best alleviated by removing gloves compared to removing a respirator, overboots or body armour liner. Reducing the evaporative resistance of materials used for such kit, particularly gloves, should be investigated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1635-1645 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Ergonomics |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Dec 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- CBRN
- gloves
- heat strain
- permeability
- Thermoregulation