Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Monitoring marine populations and communities: Methods dealing with imperfect detectability

  • S. Katsanevakis
  • , A. Weber
  • , C. Pipitone
  • , M. Leopold
  • , M. Cronin
  • , M. Scheidat
  • , T. K. Doyle
  • , L. Buhl-Mortensen
  • , P. Buhl-Mortensen
  • , G. D'Anna
  • , I. de Boois
  • , P. Dalpadado
  • , D. Damalas
  • , F. Fiorentino
  • , G. Garofalo
  • , V. M. Giacalone
  • , K. L. Hawley
  • , Y. Issaris
  • , J. Jansen
  • , C. M. Knight
  • L. Knittweis, I. Kröncke, S. Mirto, I. Muxika, H. Reiss, H. R. Skjoldal, S. Vöge
  • Hellenic Centre for Marine Research
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre
  • Norwegian Institute for Water Research
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • Institute of Marine Research
  • Ministry for Resources and Rural Affairs
  • Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung
  • AZTI
  • Nord University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Effective monitoring of populations and communities is a prerequisite for ecosystembased management of marine areas. However, monitoring programs often neglect important sources of error and thus can lead to biased estimates, spurious conclusions and false management actions. One such source of error is 'imperfect detectability', i.e. the inability of investigators to detect all individuals or all species in a surveyed area. Although there has been great effort to develop monitoring methods that account for imperfect detectability, the application of such methods in the marine environment is not as apparent as in other systems. Plot sampling is by far the most commonly applied method for biological monitoring in the marine environment, yet it largely ignores detectability issues. However, distance sampling, mark-recapture methods, repeated presence-absence surveys for occupancy estimation, and removal methods do estimate detection probabilities and provide unbiased estimates of state variables. We review these methods and the relevant tools for their application in studies on marine populations and communities, with the aim of assisting marine biologists and managers to understand the limitations and pitfalls associated with some approaches and to select the best available methods for their monitoring needs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-52
Number of pages22
JournalAquatic Biology
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Keywords

  • Biological monitoring
  • Detectability
  • Distance sampling
  • Mark-recapture
  • Occupancy
  • Plot sampling
  • Removal methods
  • Review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Monitoring marine populations and communities: Methods dealing with imperfect detectability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this