Norm-weightable Riesz spaces and the dual complexity space

  • M. O'Keeffe
  • , S. Romaguera
  • , M. Schellekens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The theory of complexity spaces has been introduced in [Sch95], where the applicability to the complexity analysis of Divide and Conquer algorithms has been discussed. This analysis has been based on the Banach Fixed Point Theorem, which has led to the study of biBanach spaces in [RS98]. In [RS96] we have introduced the dual complexity space as a convenient tool to carry out a mathematical analysis of complexity spaces. We recall that the complexity space as well as its dual are weightable quasi-metric spaces or, equivalently, partial metric spaces. Recently it has been shown that partial metric spaces correspond dually, in the context of Domain Theory, to semivaluation spaces. Here, we show that the dual complexity space is the negative cone of a biBanach norm-weightable Riesz space and characterize the class of norm-weightable Riesz spaces in terms of semivaluation spaces. In particular, we show that the quasi-norm of an element of such a Riesz space is the quasi-norm of its projection on the negative cone. Hence, quasi-norms are completely determined by partial metrics, justifying, in this context, O'Neill's analogy between these notions. It has been shown that quasi-uniform semilattices arise naturally in Domain Theory, which motivates a generalization of our characterization to the context of norm-weightable quasi-uniform Riesz spaces.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-123
Number of pages17
JournalElectronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science
Volume74
Issue numberSUPPL.
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2003

Keywords

  • Dual complexity space
  • Join semilattice
  • Negative cone
  • Norm-weightable
  • Quasi-metric space
  • Quasi-norm
  • Quasi-uniform space
  • Riesz space

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Norm-weightable Riesz spaces and the dual complexity space'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this