Patient-reported outcome measures in third molar surgery: a scoping review

Laura O'Sullivan; Rícheal Ní Ríordáin

doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.05.013

Patient-reported outcome measures in third molar surgery: a scoping review

Cork University Dental School and Hospital

University College London

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Despite a surge of interest in patient-centred outcomes (PROMs) in healthcare settings, they remain an underutilised resource in third molar surgery. Clinicians and researchers in the field of oral surgery who are interested in incorporating PROMs into their clinical practice may face challenges in instrument selection with as yet no consensus registry available. PROMs have undoubtedly transcended their original brief as research instruments, with the collection of PROMs data now a routine undertaking in many healthcare systems. Quality improvement, appropriate resource allocation, and measurement of effectiveness of interventions are but a few of their advantages. This review article presents a scoping overview of the instruments most relevant to the third molar surgery population.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1145-1150
Number of pages	6
Journal	British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume	60
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.05.013
Publication status	Published - Nov 2022

Keywords

Oral surgery
Patient reported outcome measures
Quality of life
Third molar
Wisdom tooth

Access to Document

10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.05.013

Cite this

@article{301b26065de3493da5681e41655d7ae7,

title = "Patient-reported outcome measures in third molar surgery: a scoping review",

abstract = "Despite a surge of interest in patient-centred outcomes (PROMs) in healthcare settings, they remain an underutilised resource in third molar surgery. Clinicians and researchers in the field of oral surgery who are interested in incorporating PROMs into their clinical practice may face challenges in instrument selection with as yet no consensus registry available. PROMs have undoubtedly transcended their original brief as research instruments, with the collection of PROMs data now a routine undertaking in many healthcare systems. Quality improvement, appropriate resource allocation, and measurement of effectiveness of interventions are but a few of their advantages. This review article presents a scoping overview of the instruments most relevant to the third molar surgery population.",

keywords = "Oral surgery, Patient reported outcome measures, Quality of life, Third molar, Wisdom tooth",

author = "Laura O'Sullivan and \{N{\'i} R{\'i}ord{\'a}in\}, R{\'i}cheal",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s)",

year = "2022",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.05.013",

language = "English",

volume = "60",

pages = "1145--1150",

journal = "British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery",

issn = "0266-4356",

publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-reported outcome measures in third molar surgery

T2 - a scoping review

AU - O'Sullivan, Laura

AU - Ní Ríordáin, Rícheal

PY - 2022/11

Y1 - 2022/11

N2 - Despite a surge of interest in patient-centred outcomes (PROMs) in healthcare settings, they remain an underutilised resource in third molar surgery. Clinicians and researchers in the field of oral surgery who are interested in incorporating PROMs into their clinical practice may face challenges in instrument selection with as yet no consensus registry available. PROMs have undoubtedly transcended their original brief as research instruments, with the collection of PROMs data now a routine undertaking in many healthcare systems. Quality improvement, appropriate resource allocation, and measurement of effectiveness of interventions are but a few of their advantages. This review article presents a scoping overview of the instruments most relevant to the third molar surgery population.

AB - Despite a surge of interest in patient-centred outcomes (PROMs) in healthcare settings, they remain an underutilised resource in third molar surgery. Clinicians and researchers in the field of oral surgery who are interested in incorporating PROMs into their clinical practice may face challenges in instrument selection with as yet no consensus registry available. PROMs have undoubtedly transcended their original brief as research instruments, with the collection of PROMs data now a routine undertaking in many healthcare systems. Quality improvement, appropriate resource allocation, and measurement of effectiveness of interventions are but a few of their advantages. This review article presents a scoping overview of the instruments most relevant to the third molar surgery population.

KW - Oral surgery

KW - Patient reported outcome measures

KW - Quality of life

KW - Third molar

KW - Wisdom tooth

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85133840115

U2 - 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.05.013

DO - 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.05.013

M3 - Review article

C2 - 35803785

AN - SCOPUS:85133840115

SN - 0266-4356

VL - 60

SP - 1145

EP - 1150

JO - British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

IS - 9

ER -

Patient-reported outcome measures in third molar surgery: a scoping review

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this