Abstract
It is a common claim that one concept of time, tenseless theory, is in greater conflict with how the world seems to us (with the phenomenology) than the competing theories of tense theory and presentism. This paper offers at least one counter-example to that claim. Here, it is argued that tenseless theory fares better than its competitors in capturing the phenomenology in particular cases of perception. These cases are where the visual phenomenology is of events occurring together which must be occurring at different times. The commitments of matching such phenomenology in one’s ontology undermine tense theory and presentism and support tenseless theory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 249-255 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Topoi |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2015 |
Keywords
- Eternalism
- Experience of time
- Metaphysics of time
- Presentism
- Tense theory
- Tenseless theory