TY - JOUR
T1 - Perception of inappropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation by clinicians working in emergency departments and ambulance services
T2 - The REAPPROPRIATE international, multi-centre, cross sectional survey
AU - Druwé, Patrick
AU - Monsieurs, Koenraad G.
AU - Piers, Ruth
AU - Gagg, James
AU - Nakahara, Shinji
AU - Alpert, Evan Avraham
AU - van Schuppen, Hans
AU - Élő, Gábor
AU - Truhlář, Anatolij
AU - Huybrechts, Sofie A.
AU - Mpotos, Nicolas
AU - Joly, Luc Marie
AU - Xanthos, Theodoros
AU - Roessler, Markus
AU - Paal, Peter
AU - Cocchi, Michael N.
AU - BjØrshol, Conrad
AU - Pauliková, Monika
AU - Nurmi, Jouni
AU - Salmeron, Pascual Piñera
AU - Owczuk, Radoslaw
AU - Svavarsdóttir, Hildigunnur
AU - Deasy, Conor
AU - Cimpoesu, Diana
AU - Ioannides, Marios
AU - Fuenzalida, Pablo Aguilera
AU - Kurland, Lisa
AU - Raffay, Violetta
AU - Pachys, Gal
AU - Gadeyne, Bram
AU - Steen, Johan
AU - Vansteelandt, Stijn
AU - De Paepe, Peter
AU - Benoit, Dominique D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - Introduction: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is often started irrespective of comorbidity or cause of arrest. We aimed to determine the prevalence of perception of inappropriate CPR of the last cardiac arrest encountered by clinicians working in emergency departments and out-of-hospital, factors associated with perception, and its relation to patient outcome. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 288 centres in 24 countries. Factors associated with perception of CPR and outcome were analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests and conditional logistic models. Results: Of the 4018 participating clinicians, 3150 (78.4%) perceived their last CPR attempt as appropriate, 548 (13.6%) were uncertain about its appropriateness and 320 (8.0%) perceived inappropriateness; survival to hospital discharge was 370/2412 (15.3%), 8/481 (1.7%) and 8/294 (2.7%) respectively. After adjusting for country, team and clinician's characteristics, the prevalence of perception of inappropriate CPR was higher for a non-shockable initial rhythm (OR 3.76 [2.13–6.64]; P <.0001), a non-witnessed arrest (2.68 [1.89–3.79]; P <.0001), in older patients (2.94 [2.18–3.96]; P <.0001, for patients >79 years) and in case of a “poor” first physical impression of the patient (3.45 [2.36–5.05]; P <.0001). In accordance, non-shockable and non-witnessed arrests were both associated with lower survival to hospital discharge (0.33 [0.26−0.41]; P < 0.0001 and 0.25 [0.15−0.41]; P < 0.0001, respectively), as were older patient age (0.25 [0.14−0.44]; P < 0.0001 for patients >79 years) and a “poor” first physical impression (0.26 [0.19–0.35]; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The perception of inappropriate CPR increased when objective indicators of poor prognosis were present and was associated with a low survival to hospital discharge. Factoring clinical judgment into the decision to (not) attempt CPR may reduce harm inflicted by excessive resuscitation attempts.
AB - Introduction: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is often started irrespective of comorbidity or cause of arrest. We aimed to determine the prevalence of perception of inappropriate CPR of the last cardiac arrest encountered by clinicians working in emergency departments and out-of-hospital, factors associated with perception, and its relation to patient outcome. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 288 centres in 24 countries. Factors associated with perception of CPR and outcome were analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests and conditional logistic models. Results: Of the 4018 participating clinicians, 3150 (78.4%) perceived their last CPR attempt as appropriate, 548 (13.6%) were uncertain about its appropriateness and 320 (8.0%) perceived inappropriateness; survival to hospital discharge was 370/2412 (15.3%), 8/481 (1.7%) and 8/294 (2.7%) respectively. After adjusting for country, team and clinician's characteristics, the prevalence of perception of inappropriate CPR was higher for a non-shockable initial rhythm (OR 3.76 [2.13–6.64]; P <.0001), a non-witnessed arrest (2.68 [1.89–3.79]; P <.0001), in older patients (2.94 [2.18–3.96]; P <.0001, for patients >79 years) and in case of a “poor” first physical impression of the patient (3.45 [2.36–5.05]; P <.0001). In accordance, non-shockable and non-witnessed arrests were both associated with lower survival to hospital discharge (0.33 [0.26−0.41]; P < 0.0001 and 0.25 [0.15−0.41]; P < 0.0001, respectively), as were older patient age (0.25 [0.14−0.44]; P < 0.0001 for patients >79 years) and a “poor” first physical impression (0.26 [0.19–0.35]; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The perception of inappropriate CPR increased when objective indicators of poor prognosis were present and was associated with a low survival to hospital discharge. Factoring clinical judgment into the decision to (not) attempt CPR may reduce harm inflicted by excessive resuscitation attempts.
KW - Cardiac arrest
KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
KW - Inappropriate care
KW - Out-of-hospital
KW - Perception
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85053466864
U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.09.006
DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.09.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 30218746
AN - SCOPUS:85053466864
SN - 0300-9572
VL - 132
SP - 112
EP - 119
JO - Resuscitation
JF - Resuscitation
ER -