Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Performance comparison of hierarchical modulation receiver concepts for different service classes

  • Mathias Dehm
  • , Sebastian Helmle
  • , Fabian Hohmann
  • , Michael Kuhn
  • , Christian Körner
  • , Dirk Pesch

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingsConference proceedingpeer-review

Abstract

A narrowband transmission chain using conventional quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) and soft- decoding is extended to implement hierarchical modulation. Packet error rate (PER) for different receiver concepts and modulation schemes is investigated using a multipath channel model. Two different data service classes are considered, a high priority (HP) voice stream and a low priority (LP) data stream striving for maximum throughput. Furthermore, the paper describes how hierarchical modulation is adjusted adaptively according to the channel conditions to increase the performance, i.e. the amount of successfully received data, in contrast to 4- And 16-QAM. The novel results show that hierarchical modulation achieves superior performance especially in the lower ES/N0 regions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication10th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems 2013, ISWCS 2013
PublisherIEEE Computer Society
Pages452-456
Number of pages5
ISBN (Print)9783800735297
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes
Event10th IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems 2013, ISWCS 2013 - Ilmenau, Germany
Duration: 27 Aug 201330 Aug 2013

Publication series

NameProceedings of the International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems
ISSN (Print)2154-0217
ISSN (Electronic)2154-0225

Conference

Conference10th IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems 2013, ISWCS 2013
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityIlmenau
Period27/08/1330/08/13

Keywords

  • Hierarchical systems
  • Mobile ad-hoc networks
  • Narrowband

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance comparison of hierarchical modulation receiver concepts for different service classes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this