Abstract
What role should philosophers play in public policy, especially in structured contexts like policy commissions? The commission paradigm is a formal governmental setting for discussion aimed at policy recommendations. However, it may not be obvious what philosophers (predominantly normative theorists but also others like philosophers of science) can add to such commissions. What role a philosopher should play is worthy of investigation, especially because this can allow for more explicit methodologies and procedures to be provided to other commission members. This paper considers three such roles: “the partisan” (an advocate of a specific normative position), “the populist” (an exponent of public values), and “the philosophical conduit” (an explainer of disciplinary normative positions and arguments who draws attention to divergence and convergence on policy options across normative positions).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e70128 |
| Journal | Philosophy Compass |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- philosophical methodology
- philosophy of philosophy
- policy commissions
- procedural justice
- professional ethics
- public philosophy
- public policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Philosophers in Public Policy Commissions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver