Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Practical Management of Biosimilar Use in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): A Global Survey and an International Delphi Consensus

  • Ferdinando D’Amico
  • , Virginia Solitano
  • , Fernando Magro
  • , Pablo A. Olivera
  • , Jonas Halfvarson
  • , David Rubin
  • , Axel Dignass
  • , Sameer Al Awadhi
  • , Taku Kobayashi
  • , Natália Sousa Freitas Queiroz
  • , Marta Calvo
  • , Paulo Gustavo Kotze
  • , Subrata Ghosh
  • , Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
  • , Silvio Danese
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
  • Humanitas University
  • Western University
  • University of Porto
  • Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno
  • University of Toronto
  • Örebro University
  • The University of Chicago
  • Goethe University Frankfurt
  • Dubai Hospital
  • Kitasato University
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
  • University Hospital Puerta de Hierro
  • Hospital Universitário Cajuru
  • CHU de Nancy
  • Université de Lorraine
  • Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré-Hartmann
  • McGill University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

As the patents for biologic originator drugs expire, biosimilars are emerging as cost-effective alternatives within healthcare systems. Addressing various challenges in the clinical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains crucial. To shed light on physicians’ current knowledge, beliefs, practical approaches, and concerns related to biosimilar adoption—whether initiating a biosimilar, transitioning from an originator to a biosimilar, or switching between biosimilars (including multiple switches and reverse switching)—a global survey was conducted. Fifteen physicians with expertise in the field of IBD from 13 countries attended a virtual international consensus meeting to develop practical guidance regarding biosimilar adoption worldwide, considering the survey results. This consensus centered on 10 key statements covering biosimilar effectiveness, safety, indications, rationale, multiple switches, therapeutic drug monitoring of biosimilars, non-medical switching, and future perspectives. Ultimately, the consensus affirmed that biosimilars are equally effective and safe when compared to originator drugs. They are considered suitable for both biologic-naïve patients and those who have previously been treated with originator drugs, with cost reduction being the primary motivation for transitioning from an originator drug to a biosimilar.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6350
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume12
Issue number19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

Keywords

  • bio-originators
  • biologic drug
  • biosimilars
  • Crohn’s disease
  • economics
  • IBD
  • interchangeability
  • ulcerative colitis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Practical Management of Biosimilar Use in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): A Global Survey and an International Delphi Consensus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this