Practice versus policy-led coastal defence management

  • M. C. O'Connor
  • , G. Lymbery
  • , J. A.G. Cooper
  • , J. Gault
  • , J. McKenna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Throughout northwest European coastal countries risks associated with coastal erosion are significant but spatially and temporally variable. The level of this risk is largely dependent on the extent of development within the coastal zones and a variety of approaches have been adopted for its management. The decision-making process for responding to erosion risk depends to a large extent on national policy. Coastal protection policy in northwest European countries varies in terms of the level of centralisation and formality of arrangements. In this paper the practical outworking of the informal practice-based system of Ireland, where there is no national policy framework, is compared with the policy-led system of England and Wales where formal national guidelines exist. Using case studies, the strengths and weaknesses of both the bottom-up and top-down approaches are assessed. The findings reveal strengths and weaknesses in both existing types of approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)923-929
Number of pages7
JournalMarine Policy
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Keywords

  • Coastal management
  • Coastal protection policy
  • England
  • Ireland
  • Shoreline management plans
  • Wales

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Practice versus policy-led coastal defence management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this