Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pre-treatment PSQA – Do we still need to measure and what are adequate alternatives?

  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • University Hospital Wurzberg
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The most critical failure modes that need to be detected by PSQA are errors in the beam model and algorithm limitations [1]. Patient-specific QA, i.e., measurement of the fluence from the patient plan recalculated on a phantom, is intended to ensure that calculated and delivered dose distributions are consistent. However, these phantoms are usually geometrically regular and homogeneous, and many detector arrays have quite coarse spatial resolution. The tools used for PSQA are therefore unsuitable or inherently unable to probe certain aspects of the beam model and calculation algorithm. This observation is born out in audit results; IMRT and VMAT plans containing serious dosimetric errors were not detected using departmental PSQA. Further, patient anatomy cannot be included in these measurements, so the process should more accurately be termed plan-specific than patient-specific QA.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
Article number111356
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume221
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2026
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pre-treatment PSQA – Do we still need to measure and what are adequate alternatives?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this