TY - JOUR
T1 - Precision Psychobiotics for Gut–Brain Axis Health
T2 - Advancing the Discovery Pipelines to Deliver Mechanistic Pathways and Proven Health Efficacy
AU - Slykerman, Rebecca F.
AU - Davies, Naomi
AU - Vlckova, Klara
AU - O'Riordan, Kenneth J.
AU - Bassett, Shalome A.
AU - Dekker, James
AU - Schellekens, Harriët
AU - Hyland, Niall P.
AU - Clarke, Gerard
AU - Patterson, Elaine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Advancing microbiome–gut–brain axis science requires systematic, rational and translational approaches to bridge the critical knowledge gaps currently preventing full exploitation of the gut microbiome as a tractable therapeutic target for gastrointestinal, mental and brain health. Current research is still marked by many open questions that undermine widespread application to humans. For example, the lack of mechanistic understanding of probiotic effects means it remains unclear why even apparently closely related strains exhibit different effects in vivo. For the therapeutic application of live microbial psychobiotics, consensus on their application as adjunct treatments to conventional neuromodulators, use in unmedicated populations or in at-risk cohorts with sub-clinical symptomatology is warranted. This missing information on both sides of the therapeutic equation when treating central nervous system (CNS) conditions makes psychobiotic research challenging, especially when compared to other pharmaceutical or functional food approaches. Expediting the transition from positive preclinical data to proven benefits in humans includes interpreting the promises and pitfalls of animal behavioural assays, as well as navigating mechanism-informed decision making to select the right microbe(s) for the job. In this review, we consider how these decisions can be supported in light of information accrued from a range of clinical studies across healthy, at-risk and pathological study populations, where specific strains have been evaluated in the context of gastrointestinal physiology, brain function and behaviour. Examples of successful, partial and unsuccessful translation from bench to bedside are considered. We also discuss the developments in in silico analyses that have enhanced our understanding of the gut microbiome and that have moved research towards pinpointing the host–microbe interactions most important for optimal gut–brain axis function. Combining this information with knowledge from functional assays across in vitro and ex vivo domains and incorporating model organisms can prime the discovery pipelines with the most promising and rationally selected psychobiotic candidates.
AB - Advancing microbiome–gut–brain axis science requires systematic, rational and translational approaches to bridge the critical knowledge gaps currently preventing full exploitation of the gut microbiome as a tractable therapeutic target for gastrointestinal, mental and brain health. Current research is still marked by many open questions that undermine widespread application to humans. For example, the lack of mechanistic understanding of probiotic effects means it remains unclear why even apparently closely related strains exhibit different effects in vivo. For the therapeutic application of live microbial psychobiotics, consensus on their application as adjunct treatments to conventional neuromodulators, use in unmedicated populations or in at-risk cohorts with sub-clinical symptomatology is warranted. This missing information on both sides of the therapeutic equation when treating central nervous system (CNS) conditions makes psychobiotic research challenging, especially when compared to other pharmaceutical or functional food approaches. Expediting the transition from positive preclinical data to proven benefits in humans includes interpreting the promises and pitfalls of animal behavioural assays, as well as navigating mechanism-informed decision making to select the right microbe(s) for the job. In this review, we consider how these decisions can be supported in light of information accrued from a range of clinical studies across healthy, at-risk and pathological study populations, where specific strains have been evaluated in the context of gastrointestinal physiology, brain function and behaviour. Examples of successful, partial and unsuccessful translation from bench to bedside are considered. We also discuss the developments in in silico analyses that have enhanced our understanding of the gut microbiome and that have moved research towards pinpointing the host–microbe interactions most important for optimal gut–brain axis function. Combining this information with knowledge from functional assays across in vitro and ex vivo domains and incorporating model organisms can prime the discovery pipelines with the most promising and rationally selected psychobiotic candidates.
KW - behaviour
KW - GPCR
KW - gut-brain axis
KW - microbiome
KW - probiotic
KW - psychobiotic
KW - short chain fatty acids
KW - tryptophan
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85214930387
U2 - 10.1111/1751-7915.70079
DO - 10.1111/1751-7915.70079
M3 - Short survey
C2 - 39815671
AN - SCOPUS:85214930387
SN - 1751-7907
VL - 18
JO - Microbial Biotechnology
JF - Microbial Biotechnology
IS - 1
M1 - e70079
ER -