Privacy and Search Engines: Forgetting or Contextualizing?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article considers the much-criticized 'right to be forgotten' in the context of the European Court of Justice's judgment in the Google Spain case. It defends the 'right to be forgotten' as a metaphor that can provide us with a better understanding of the particular privacy con- cerns of the search-engine age and their interaction with the freedom to access information, and draws on Goffman's idea of 'information games' and Nissenbaum's theory of 'contextual integrity'. While sup- porting the principles that underpin the judgment, the article rejects the Court's binary approach of 'forgetting' versus 'remembering' personal information. Instead, it argues that the EU legislator should introduce more nuanced means of addressing modern privacy con- cerns. By establishing two remedies - 'delisting' or 'reordering', depending on the nature of the information - online information flows can be adjusted to preserve both the right to privacy and the freedom to access information in more contextually appropriate ways.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-284
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Law and Society
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Privacy and Search Engines: Forgetting or Contextualizing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this