TY - JOUR
T1 - 'Private Family Arrangements' for Children in Ireland
T2 - The Informal Grey Space In-Between State Care and the Family Home
AU - Burns, Kenneth
AU - O'Mahony, Conor
AU - Brennan, Rebekah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers.
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - The literature on alternative care focuses overwhelmingly on formal, court-ordered placements; voluntary care placements are discussed less frequently. Least attention of all has been given to informal kinship care placements, where a child is cared for by relatives but is not formally in the legal care of state authorities. In Ireland, these placements, when facilitated by state authorities in lieu of a care order or voluntary care agreement, are known by professionals as 'private family arrangements'. This article explores evidence which shows that the use of such arrangements is motivated partly by a concern for subsidiarity, and partly by necessity: they provide a source of placements in cases where regulatory requirements and a lack of resources would otherwise make the placement challenging or impossible. However, this strategy carries significant risks. Private family arrangements receive less support and oversight from state authorities than formal care placements, and family members providing care under this model have no legal rights or responsibilities in respect of the child(ren). This places the child(ren) in a precarious position and raises concerns regarding a lack of equity of care. The article will illustrate the impact of these concerns and make recommendations for reform.
AB - The literature on alternative care focuses overwhelmingly on formal, court-ordered placements; voluntary care placements are discussed less frequently. Least attention of all has been given to informal kinship care placements, where a child is cared for by relatives but is not formally in the legal care of state authorities. In Ireland, these placements, when facilitated by state authorities in lieu of a care order or voluntary care agreement, are known by professionals as 'private family arrangements'. This article explores evidence which shows that the use of such arrangements is motivated partly by a concern for subsidiarity, and partly by necessity: they provide a source of placements in cases where regulatory requirements and a lack of resources would otherwise make the placement challenging or impossible. However, this strategy carries significant risks. Private family arrangements receive less support and oversight from state authorities than formal care placements, and family members providing care under this model have no legal rights or responsibilities in respect of the child(ren). This places the child(ren) in a precarious position and raises concerns regarding a lack of equity of care. The article will illustrate the impact of these concerns and make recommendations for reform.
KW - child protection
KW - children's rights
KW - informal kinship care
KW - kinship diversion
KW - private family arrangements
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85126816871
U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcab032
DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcab032
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126816871
SN - 0045-3102
VL - 51
SP - 1203
EP - 1220
JO - British Journal of Social Work
JF - British Journal of Social Work
IS - 4
ER -