TY - JOUR
T1 - Provocative growth hormone testing in children
T2 - How did we get here and where do we go now?
AU - Kamoun, Camilia
AU - Hawkes, Colin Patrick
AU - Grimberg, Adda
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 De Gruyter. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - Objectives: Provocative growth hormone (GH) tests are widely used for diagnosing pediatric GH deficiency (GHD). A thorough understanding of the evidence behind commonly used interpretations and the limitations of these tests is important for improving clinical practice. Content: To place current practice into a historical context, the supporting evidence behind the use of provocative GH tests is presented. By reviewing GH measurement techniques and examining the early data supporting the most common tests and later studies that compared provocative agents to establish reference ranges, the low sensitivity and specificity of these tests become readily apparent. Studies that assess the effects of patient factors, such as obesity and sex steroids, on GH testing further bring the appropriateness of commonly used cutoffs for diagnosing GHD into question. Summary and Outlook: Despite the widely recognized poor performance of provocative GH tests in distinguishing GH sufficiency from deficiency, limited progress has been made in improving them. New diagnostic modalities are needed, but until they become available, clinicians can improve the clinical application of provocative GH tests by taking into account the multiple factors that influence their results.
AB - Objectives: Provocative growth hormone (GH) tests are widely used for diagnosing pediatric GH deficiency (GHD). A thorough understanding of the evidence behind commonly used interpretations and the limitations of these tests is important for improving clinical practice. Content: To place current practice into a historical context, the supporting evidence behind the use of provocative GH tests is presented. By reviewing GH measurement techniques and examining the early data supporting the most common tests and later studies that compared provocative agents to establish reference ranges, the low sensitivity and specificity of these tests become readily apparent. Studies that assess the effects of patient factors, such as obesity and sex steroids, on GH testing further bring the appropriateness of commonly used cutoffs for diagnosing GHD into question. Summary and Outlook: Despite the widely recognized poor performance of provocative GH tests in distinguishing GH sufficiency from deficiency, limited progress has been made in improving them. New diagnostic modalities are needed, but until they become available, clinicians can improve the clinical application of provocative GH tests by taking into account the multiple factors that influence their results.
KW - Children
KW - Growth hormone assay
KW - Growth hormone deficiency
KW - Growth hormone stimulation tests
KW - Provocative growth hormone testing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85104438929
U2 - 10.1515/jpem-2021-0045
DO - 10.1515/jpem-2021-0045
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33838090
AN - SCOPUS:85104438929
SN - 0334-018X
VL - 34
SP - 679
EP - 696
JO - Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism
JF - Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism
IS - 6
ER -