Public–Private Divide

  • Therese Kenna

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingsChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The public–private divide is a powerful dichotomy, informing much governmental decision-making, action, and policymaking, as well as many social and spatial realities. The common usage of the terms “public” and “private” contributes to considerable ambiguity around what these terms actually mean. Reflecting some of dominant ways that the public–private divide has been conceptualized and defined are four thematic groupings, namely the liberal-economistic model, the republican-virtue approach, public life as sociability and private life as withdrawal, and the gendered associations of public and private life. There is a need to consider the conceptualization of the public–private divide in non-Western contexts, which contributes to the diversification of our knowledge and theories of the public and private. It is also important to examine how the notions of public and private are evolving in the digital era, transforming demarcations between the public and private.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Second Edition
PublisherElsevier
Pages121-125
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9780081022955
ISBN (Print)9780081022962
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Demarcation
  • Digital technologies
  • Hybrid
  • ICTs
  • Non-Western
  • Privacy
  • Privatization
  • Public life
  • Public sphere
  • Spatial manifestations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public–Private Divide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this