Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quantitative assessment of dynamic PET imaging data in cancer imaging

  • Mark Muzi
  • , Finbarr O'Sullivan
  • , David A. Mankoff
  • , Robert K. Doot
  • , Larry A. Pierce
  • , Brenda F. Kurland
  • , Hannah M. Linden
  • , Paul E. Kinahan
  • University of Washington
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Clinical imaging in positron emission tomography (PET) is often performed using single-time-point estimates of tracer uptake or static imaging that provides a spatial map of regional tracer concentration. However, dynamic tracer imaging can provide considerably more information about in vivo biology by delineating both the temporal and spatial pattern of tracer uptake. In addition, several potential sources of error that occur in static imaging can be mitigated. This review focuses on the application of dynamic PET imaging to measuring regional cancer biologic features and especially in using dynamic PET imaging for quantitative therapeutic response monitoring for cancer clinical trials. Dynamic PET imaging output parameters, particularly transport (flow) and overall metabolic rate, have provided imaging end points for clinical trials at single-center institutions for years. However, dynamic imaging poses many challenges for multicenter clinical trial implementations from cross-center calibration to the inadequacy of a common informatics infrastructure. Underlying principles and methodology of PET dynamic imaging are first reviewed, followed by an examination of current approaches to dynamic PET image analysis with a specific case example of dynamic fluorothymidine imaging to illustrate the approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1203-1215
Number of pages13
JournalMagnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume30
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Compartmental modeling
  • Dynamic PET/CT
  • Multicenter clinical trials
  • Parametric imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative assessment of dynamic PET imaging data in cancer imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this