Radiographers’ perspectives on immobilisation and restraint mechanisms in paediatric radiography

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: The utilisation of immobilisation or restraint during paediatric radiography is a multifactorial issue with associated legal and ethical considerations. Current practice regularly presents challenges for radiographers, with a notable absence of any professional best-practice guidance. This study investigated radiographers’ perspectives in Ireland on the use of immobilisation or restraint methods and the factors influencing these choices and aimed to fill the 20-year gap in European radiographers’ perspectives gaining an up-to-date understanding and contribute to the global conversation in this regard. Methods: An anonymous online survey design was constructed using the Google Forms platform and distributed to hospital radiology departments across the Southern region of Ireland. Additionally, a short survey was send to the head of the nine radiology departments to audit the existing availability of immobilisation and/or restraint devices for paediatric radiography. Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) were undertaken. Bar charts were utilised where appropriate to display trends. Results: One hundered and three responses were received. The majority of radiographers reported using immobilisation (95 %) or restraint (89 %) techniques during paediatric radiography, although 70 % acknowledged the lack of training regarding restraint techniques. However, 93 % reported trying alternative techniques such as distraction and negotiation to avoid immobilisation or restraint. A desire for further guidance and training was reported, with 80 % of respondents noting training as essential or potentially beneficial. Conclusions: Ambiguity remains surrounding the distinction between the terms “restraint” and “immobilisation” in paediatric radiography. Radiographers' use of restraint and immobilisation during paediatric radiography is influenced by the child's age, distress level, radiation protection and safety, and the ability of the child to understand instructions. Appropriate up-to-date guidelines and training would be recommended to clarify terminology and promote the safe practice of restraint and immobilisation during paediatric radiography.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101738
JournalJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Digital radiography
  • Immobilisation
  • Paediatric radiology
  • Radiography
  • Restraint mechanisms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radiographers’ perspectives on immobilisation and restraint mechanisms in paediatric radiography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this